
Candidate Andrew Ginther
Mayor Andrew Ginther is ready for round three. After serving the city of Columbus from the top political position for the past eight years, he’s ready for four more. In today’s interview, Ginther talks more about police reform, housing development, zoning updates, and economic development.
Shownotes
Read the transcript
Welcome to the Confluence Cast, presented by Columbus Underground. We are a weekly Columbus-centric podcast focusing on the civics, lifestyle, entertainment, and people of our city. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. This week, in anticipation of this fall's election, the Confluence Cast is endeavoring to introduce Columbus voters to the 12 council and two mayoral candidates in their own words. Mayor Andrew Ginther is ready for round three. After serving the city of Columbus from the top political position for the past eight years, he's running for four more. In today's interview, Ginther talks about police reform, housing development, zoning updates, and economic development. You can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Enjoy the interview. Sitting down here in person with Mayor Andrew Ginther. Mayor Ginther, how are you, sir? Doing great. Thanks for having me. Good. Tell us about how it's been. You're coming up on the end of two terms as mayor, running for your third. How has that office held you? You know, it's been one of the greatest honors of my life to serve as mayor in the city I grew up in. There aren't too many folks that get to have their dream job in their hometown, and I've had an absolute blast. I'd be lying to you if I told you the last four years have been any easy walk in the park. A global pandemic, the greatest racial reckoning on police-community relations in a generation, and a spike in violence that cities across America have been facing — it has been challenging. In the last four years in particular, I've never quite had the personal and the professional intersect with such acuity as the last four years. So I've lost my mother, my father, and my niece in a tragic car accident, all during that same period of time. And so generally, when your professional life is going well, your personal life might be troubling, or vice versa. This is the first time in my life where I've had both be so challenging and difficult at the same time. So I have been very grateful for my faith and my family to help me during an especially challenging time, and couldn't be more upbeat and optimistic about the future.
Talk us through some of the successes you feel like you've had in either of the two terms. Well, I'm really proud of the fact we have made more reforms and changes to the Division of Police than ever before in the city's history. We hired the first chief of police from outside the Division of Police. We've been talking about a civilian review board and inspector general for decades in Columbus. We got it done. It's in place. It's in operation. And I'm really proud of the fact that, you know, there's still a lot of work to be done — when you're changing culture, it takes time. But the chief is making significant progress with changing the culture of the Division of Police, taking us from being a 20th-century law enforcement organization to a 21st-century community policing organization. And I think you can see that in the great work of the dialogue team under the direction and guidance of Dr. Clifford Stott, who's now kind of in residence, if you will, at the Glenn College at Ohio State. He's one of the world's leading experts on dealing with First Amendment protest issues, and really helped us realize that it's not just about protests and First Amendment issues, where we clearly missed the mark and fell short in 2020 and have made significant changes and reforms there, but also just the way true community policing needs to happen. You know, so much of policing is that consent is given by the government — it is granted to them, and it is based on legitimacy. So the more legitimacy the Division of Police has, the safer we will all be. And so he's helping us to continue to change the culture of the Division of Police, while investing in more and more officers. That comprehensive approach — prevention, intervention, and enforcement — that's so critically important. Sorry, yeah, just to ask what that looks like on the ground, because I've seen him quoted — I don't quite recall when exactly he was announced, but I see him quoted, and his quotes are, "This is evidence that this is needed." And not so much — and maybe it's truncating because of column inches — but not so much a conversation of, here's what the outcome's going to be, here's what the boots on the ground look like, forgive that analogy. And is there, you know, basically a policy stance that comes out of that? Well, I think what people are going to see, touch, and feel, you can get a sense of with our dialogue team. Those teams in the blue vests, particularly around First Amendment demonstrations and protests, are on the scene, managing relationships, and making sure there's a good flow of communication for folks who may have dramatically different perspectives or takes on that person's position, but their ability to safely and respectfully have their First Amendment rights respected. That's a clear indication. I think you also are going to see more and more officers embracing the de-escalation model and approach. That's part of the reason we've so dramatically increased our alternative crisis response. So we now have firefighters and paramedics and social workers responding to calls for service, maybe with and without uniformed police officers, because depending on the situation — particularly if you're in mental health crisis, or there's an overdose — having a uniformed law enforcement officer may or may not be what is required. And so the Right Response pilot has continued to grow. Obviously, our RREACT team, SPARK, there's so many other great alternative response models that have really developed, and we're looking to continue to build those out. The ADAMH crisis center will open in the next two years, which should be really important, because right now, if you are in mental health crisis or you overdose, our officers really have only two places to take you: to an ER or to jail. And people in mental health crisis or that are battling addiction don't belong in either one of those places. They belong in treatment. And that's what we're so excited about with the ADAMH crisis center. And so by building out these models, funding them, growing them, and expanding them, we think that we're going to better serve the people of Columbus — first of all, getting people what they need when they need it, and also being able to devote more of our police response to fighting violent crime, because that's where our focus needs to be: reducing violent crime, and having other members of the collaborative effort helping to take care of folks who have mental health crisis or they're battling addiction.
What other thing, other than policing? Violence, and it's a big issue. Sure, huge issue. I think it's the number one issue. And it's one that takes up the overwhelming majority of the city budget. And we've seen some success. We had, in 2020 to 2021, a 33% reduction in homicide and violent crime. It's picked up a little bit this year — we have about 10 more homicides as of today than we did a year ago. But one of the things that is particularly disturbing is the amount of homicides as a result of domestic violence situations. So this year, I think we're at about 18 homicides as a result of domestic violence situations. So sometimes that's parent-child, sometimes it's intimate partner, or husband-wife. But also this year, we've had issues with siblings. And one of the things we're really focused on is, I mean, that's not necessarily a situation that police can prevent or stop, right? We need to make sure that families in crisis — and clearly we have a number of families in crisis — are getting the services and resources that they need, and that folks that are in a domestic violence situation are seeking out the help they need to try to prevent what is maybe a violent situation from becoming a deadly situation. And access to guns and the proliferation of guns — I know we're going to talk a little bit about that, because one of the number one contributors to the spike in violence we've seen is the most reckless and careless gun policy in the state's history. And this isn't just a beginner's assault. This is the overwhelming majority of Ohioans who oppose concealed carry, who oppose stand your ground, who oppose permitless carry. And so law enforcement, prosecutors, gun safety advocates — and all the research shows it isn't about right or left, Republican, Democrat. You go to the Johns Hopkins public health law journal, and you look: the states with the highest rates of violent crime are the states with the most reckless and dangerous gun laws. And so our challenge is this: the state legislature knows what it needs to do. Ninety-two percent of Ohioans support some level of training in order to own a firearm, 75% support uniform background checks, nearly 60% support an assault weapons ban. These are all things that Republicans, Democrats, independents all support. And the legislature refuses to act on what we know is good policy based on evidence and research. At least get out of our way and let cities take the actions that we need to take to protect the people, to protect our officers. We've had more officers assaulted and shot this year than in recent history. And we've got to go after this proliferation of guns that are out there on Columbus streets, and streets around the country. And from a policing standpoint, I realize what can happen there to help get rid of guns. I guess I wonder what actions you feel like — I think you just said your hands are tied in terms of not being able to bring up legislation that would make it harder for folks to own guns. Are there action items you feel like you could take? Yeah, and we're going to continue to be creative and innovative. And we're not seeing it, and we're going to fight back. Right now we're in court, as you know, with the state over common-sense safe storage — requiring people, if they have a firearm in the home, that they lock it up and make sure it's out of the hands. But the state is fighting us on that. And we have prevailed before; we hope to prevail again in court. You know, some comments about banning the capacity of large magazines, so that we don't have a semi-automatic become an automatic and have deadly situations where dozens and dozens of people were shot in 30 seconds or less because of large-capacity magazines. So these are very common-sense things that we're putting in place, attempting to do what the state legislature refuses to do — quite honestly, has attempted to preempt us on. But we're not accepting that. We're not standing back and hoping they're going to change their mind. We're going to keep pushing it, we're going to be aggressive.
I'm going to pivot a little bit to the things that maybe you think that you haven't been successful on over the past eight years. What regrets do you think you have there? Well, there are many regrets. I had mentioned, I think, not meeting the community's expectations back in 2020 with respect to how we handled peaceful protesters. We know there were also people that were doing property damage and assaulting police officers and assaulting others — I'm not talking about those. But how we handled folks who were peacefully protesting and demonstrating and advocating their First Amendment rights. And so you've seen a huge shift in the way that we handle large crowds and protests. Part of that is under the advice and guidance of Dr. Clifford Stott, that I mentioned, who's at the Glenn College; obviously complying and following the Marbley decision from Judge Marbley, and other changes that we made just based on best practices, and certainly with our new chief of police, who handled things very differently in her role when she was with Detroit and obviously wanted to see what best practices look like from across the country. I think one of the other things that I really had hoped to make more progress on — although I'm very proud of our record on housing — is having more partners in the region joining this effort. We've made some good progress. We have folks now in Franklin County and the adjacent counties talking about housing. We have, for the first time ever, secured a quarter of a billion dollars in two separate bond packages, voted authority to use capital funds toward affordable housing and getting more housing units going. But as you know, we've had a supply problem. Before the Great Recession, we've had only about half the number of units coming to market, at all price points, right? Because we need market rate, we need workforce attainable, and we need affordable. And I want us to dramatically double the number of units coming to market every year for the next 15 years, and collectively invest a billion dollars in getting more units to the market. Because we know that because of the supply problem, the folks that are feeling the squeeze the most with respect to rents — and certainly valuations, price points, and appraisals — have been folks on the lower earning income level. So those folks that have any increase or increased valuation and costs associated with that — 15% or 20% — it is really squeezing those folks. So we need more of everything coming to market, and creating that pipeline. One of the biggest pieces to that is also changing our zoning code. We're rewriting our zoning code for the first time in 70 years. Think about where Columbus was 70 years ago, think about where we are today. It is going to really be challenging. There's a reason folks haven't rewritten this in 70 years. And we're going to have to increase density, we're going to have to embrace height, because those are the two major contributors to affordability. I would argue that this region has had a sprawl strategy for the last 40 years. It hasn't necessarily served us well, and it's certainly not sustainable if we're going to grow by a third more people in the region over the next 20 or 30 years. So we're making some progress there. I wish we were further along on the housing front, but I'm really hopeful that there is going to be a regional housing collaborative, because the city of Columbus can't solve the housing challenges of the region all by ourselves. We need our suburban neighbors in Franklin County and the adjacent counties to join us in this effort. I guess I'm curious. So just to boil down what I just heard: it's partnerships, it's investment, and zoning. I guess my curiosity and concern is, at what point are we too late? At what point are we Austin? And, like, the ground was broken on Intel. Is it coming far enough, quick enough, for us not to experience a real problem? So just to put it in perspective, I think there were about 12,000 housing units — we've been averaging about 12,000 housing units coming to market every year for the last 10 or 15 years. Austin has 40,000. We need to double the number of units just to maintain the certain level of affordability that we have now.
We had a problem before Intel. Yes, got it. And my challenge has been, you know, as mayor for the last eight years, I feel like I've been talking about housing for eight years, but it was only until Intel and Honda and LG that folks, I feel like, started talking about it and paying attention to it and realizing that we have to do something. I would argue that one of the things that is really important is the business community now views housing as a huge economic development issue. Because if you're a major employer that's coming to Central Ohio, and you want to attract the best and the brightest from around the country and the world, they need some place to live, and a place that they can afford, in a neighborhood with amenities that they desire. And so housing has gone from something that some folks were interested in — maybe more in the nonprofit, higher ed, planning, and development realms — to now CEOs and corporate leaders saying, this is a threat to our economic future, from a job development or economic development, job creation standpoint. If we don't have more housing of all types available — we just believe passionately that if you work in this region, you ought to be able to live here too. Whether you drive a bus, whether you run a company, whether you teach school, whether you're taking care of my mom and dad in a senior center, there's a place for you in this community. And we have a lot of work to do. Do you see the business community stepping up? I do. I do. I think in particular, Steve Steinour, our Huntington, has been a very passionate, strong leader in the housing effort. Kenny McDonald has been part of this regional housing; he's the president and CEO of the Columbus Partnership. He's been working closely with the Affordable Housing Trust and other community partners around this regional housing collaborative. And so obviously we've got great advocates in this community — CEOs and business leaders, whether it's Tanny Crane or other business leaders that are engaged in this work. So I'm hopeful. But to answer the question you asked earlier, I think we really — the next five to 10 years are going to be absolutely critical, and probably closer to five than 10. I mean, we have to move with a sense of urgency and purpose, but also resiliency, because this is the challenge: when you're rewriting zoning codes and making very difficult decisions that involve most people's largest investment — right, their home — there are going to be setbacks, there are going to be challenges. There are a lot of people that are going to have a very vested interest in keeping things the way they are. But that's not the way we want Columbus. We don't just want to be bigger, I want to be better. And that means we're going to have to make difficult decisions around land use, around density, around height, around transit — you know, with the LinkUS initiative that we're hoping to put back on the ballot in the fall of November 2024, that is going to be a game changer for our community. We need to invest in ourselves now, so that we can leave our kids and our grandkids the type of community that they're going to raise their kids in.
In addition to the matters you've already brought up, talk to me about basically making the choice to run again, and what you hope to accomplish during that time. Yeah, I take this very seriously. And as we talked about, the last couple of years in leadership, leadership has been very lonely — probably not nearly as lonely as any other time in our city's history, some of the most challenging times. And so I spent some time with this. About a year or so ago, I really thought about it, because I think you've got to be all in when you're running for mayor. There may be other elected offices you can run for, but if you're running for mayor, you've got to be all in, and you've got to be all in for the next four years. And so after I thought through it and made my decision, I went to my wife and daughter, because they've been through a lot too over the last four years, and have seen some things that they've never seen before, and some challenges. And they've seen their husband and their father go through some things that no other mayor has ever gone through. And so I talked with them about their support for running for a third term. So I'm really excited. I am really excited. Never been more bullish and hopeful about Columbus's future. I believe that we are in a special moment in our city's history, where if we make the right decisions — they're going to be difficult, they're going to be challenging, we're going to make mistakes — but if we make a concerted effort and commitment to one another, that we're going to do what's in the community's best interest, and we're going to invest in our people and our neighborhoods and a better quality of life, we're on a pretty incredible trajectory to, again, not just grow for the sake of growth, not just be bigger, but better, and to manage a tremendous amount of growth in a relatively short period of time, in a thoughtful, equitable, progressive way. Okay, harkening back to the focus areas that you had before, around policing, around guns, around gun violence, around violence in general. It strikes me a bit that I've seen a campaign from you before that was much more focused on neighborhoods, and basically the good — the investments and the personality of the city. And now, having to focus on policing, violence, the more difficult and certainly challenging things — the positive and the negative. I'm curious if you feel that way, if you feel like you've had to pivot in that way. Well, when you're the mayor, you have it all on your plate. And I still believe my top three priorities are neighborhoods, neighborhoods, neighborhoods. Now, we may have been talking about decades of disinvestment in neighborhoods that had been left out, left behind of Columbus's success story. And I've been very purposeful and intentional about lifting those up — you know, Linden, the Hilltop, and our next area of focus is going to be that Eastland area. And equity is not equality. There are some in our community that want everything to be split up evenly, and let everybody do the best they can with what they have and hope for the best. What I've called for through the equity agenda and Opportunity Rising is to be very purposeful and intentional: we're going to invest more in neighbors and neighborhoods that have been left out and left behind. And so that isn't necessarily a value shared by everybody. I have been openly criticized for focusing so much on Linden and the Hilltop and the South Side, and that's okay, because I mean, it's very purposeful and intentional. And that's where I'm going to continue to invest. We're going to continue to provide great city services throughout our city, but we're going to be very focused on these neighborhoods that quite honestly haven't shared in the same levels of economic success as the rest of the city. Now, that extends to safety, right? So not only do you have the One Linden plan, where public and private and everyone have invested at this point $150 million, when you take a look at all the investments — from the Linden Community Center, the redesign of Hudson Avenue, the Habitat for Humanity investments, Nationwide Children's Hospital — that extends to the South Side. Envision Hilltop is a plan, and both of those plans were created by and driven by the neighborhoods, because we thought it was critically important. We were coming up with neighborhood plans that were owned by the community, that they weren't dropped in at city hall in different diverse neighborhoods throughout the city. And Envision Hilltop has already seen the Hilltop early childhood center that's going to offer 200 high-quality preschool spots right there. One of the poorest-enrolled preschool areas of the city, the fewest amount of spots available, were over on the Hilltop. And to have that place open and now taking in kids and helping to get them ready for kindergarten at Highland, at John Burroughs, and other elementary schools on the Hilltop — you know, we're really proud of that. And we're going to continue to invest in neighborhoods, as well as neighborhood safety, to make sure that we're honoring our commitments.
I end every interview with two questions, juxtaposing them. One, what do you think Columbus is doing well? And what do you think Columbus is doing not so well? I would still argue that Columbus is doing very well at our collaboration, cooperation, partnership. You know, I am very engaged with the Central Ohio Mayors and City Managers Association, the Ohio Mayors Alliance, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors. And there are many mayors from around the country that are envious of our ability. Not only can we get the public sector and the private sector in the room — there are some communities around the country where you can't get the city and the county in the room, even if they're all the same party, certainly not the city, the county, and the state, where they may be of different parties, and then you have the private sector and higher ed and nonprofits. I think there are a lot of places in the country — they talk to me all the time, and I know business leaders from around the country that come in here all the time, and higher ed and nonprofit leaders, that talk about this collaboration, this commitment to the greater good, on behalf of the community, which I think is going to serve us well. It's served us well for economic development, it's served us well for neighborhood development. I think it's going to serve us exceptionally well with this great challenge around housing and transit in the years ahead. I would say the other challenge — because growth has happened relatively slowly, minimally, and consistently for the last 70 years — creating that sense of urgency has been challenging, because as we said earlier, I think we do have this five-to-10-year window. This is a critically important time and window to make some very difficult decisions. So the time for study and analysis and looking around is over at best. It is time to do, it is time to act. And that isn't to say we're going to be perfect. But the time for studying and designing and analysis for the sake of paralysis is over. It's time to act. And that's the part where I think we need to make some strides in the next 12, 24, 36 months. That's fair. You'll get there. Thank you for your time. Thanks for having me. Good to be with you.
Thank you for listening to the Confluence Cast, presented by Columbus Underground. Again, you can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Please rate, subscribe, share this episode of the Confluence Cast with your friends, family, contacts, enemies, your favorite voter. If you're interested in sponsoring the Confluence Cast, get in touch with us. We can be reached by email at info@theconfluencecast.com. Our theme music was composed by Benji Robinson. Our producer is Phil Cogley. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. Have a great week.
Transcript4,627 words
Tim Fulton Welcome to the Confluence Cast, presented by Columbus Underground. We are a weekly Columbus-centric podcast focusing on the civics, lifestyle, entertainment, and people of our city. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. This week, in anticipation of this fall's election, the Confluence Cast is endeavoring to introduce Columbus voters to the 12 council and two mayoral candidates in their own words. Mayor Andrew Ginther is ready for round three. After serving the city of Columbus from the top political position for the past eight years, he's running for four more. In today's interview, Ginther talks about police reform, housing development, zoning updates, and economic development. You can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Enjoy the interview. Sitting down here in person with Mayor Andrew Ginther. Mayor Ginther, how are you, sir?
Andrew Ginther Doing great. Thanks for having me.
Tim Fulton Good. Tell us about how it's been. You're coming up on the end of two terms as mayor, running for your third. How has that office held you?
Andrew Ginther You know, it's been one of the greatest honors of my life to serve as mayor in the city I grew up in. There aren't too many folks that get to have their dream job in their hometown, and I've had an absolute blast. I'd be lying to you if I told you the last four years have been any easy walk in the park. A global pandemic, the greatest racial reckoning on police-community relations in a generation, and a spike in violence that cities across America have been facing — it has been challenging. In the last four years in particular, I've never quite had the personal and the professional intersect with such acuity as the last four years. So I've lost my mother, my father, and my niece in a tragic car accident, all during that same period of time. And so generally, when your professional life is going well, your personal life might be troubling, or vice versa. This is the first time in my life where I've had both be so challenging and difficult at the same time. So I have been very grateful for my faith and my family to help me during an especially challenging time, and couldn't be more upbeat and optimistic about the future.
Tim Fulton Talk us through some of the successes you feel like you've had in either of the two terms.
Andrew Ginther Well, I'm really proud of the fact we have made more reforms and changes to the Division of Police than ever before in the city's history. We hired the first chief of police from outside the Division of Police. We've been talking about a civilian review board and inspector general for decades in Columbus. We got it done. It's in place. It's in operation. And I'm really proud of the fact that, you know, there's still a lot of work to be done — when you're changing culture, it takes time. But the chief is making significant progress with changing the culture of the Division of Police, taking us from being a 20th-century law enforcement organization to a 21st-century community policing organization. And I think you can see that in the great work of the dialogue team under the direction and guidance of Dr. Clifford Stott, who's now kind of in residence, if you will, at the Glenn College at Ohio State. He's one of the world's leading experts on dealing with First Amendment protest issues, and really helped us realize that it's not just about protests and First Amendment issues, where we clearly missed the mark and fell short in 2020 and have made significant changes and reforms there, but also just the way true community policing needs to happen. You know, so much of policing is that consent is given by the government — it is granted to them, and it is based on legitimacy. So the more legitimacy the Division of Police has, the safer we will all be. And so he's helping us to continue to change the culture of the Division of Police, while investing in more and more officers. That comprehensive approach — prevention, intervention, and enforcement — that's so critically important.
Tim Fulton Sorry, yeah, just to ask what that looks like on the ground, because I've seen him quoted — I don't quite recall when exactly he was announced, but I see him quoted, and his quotes are, "This is evidence that this is needed." And not so much — and maybe it's truncating because of column inches — but not so much a conversation of, here's what the outcome's going to be, here's what the boots on the ground look like, forgive that analogy. And is there, you know, basically a policy stance that comes out of that?
Andrew Ginther Well, I think what people are going to see, touch, and feel, you can get a sense of with our dialogue team. Those teams in the blue vests, particularly around First Amendment demonstrations and protests, are on the scene, managing relationships, and making sure there's a good flow of communication for folks who may have dramatically different perspectives or takes on that person's position, but their ability to safely and respectfully have their First Amendment rights respected. That's a clear indication. I think you also are going to see more and more officers embracing the de-escalation model and approach. That's part of the reason we've so dramatically increased our alternative crisis response. So we now have firefighters and paramedics and social workers responding to calls for service, maybe with and without uniformed police officers, because depending on the situation — particularly if you're in mental health crisis, or there's an overdose — having a uniformed law enforcement officer may or may not be what is required. And so the Right Response pilot has continued to grow. Obviously, our RREACT team, SPARK, there's so many other great alternative response models that have really developed, and we're looking to continue to build those out. The ADAMH crisis center will open in the next two years, which should be really important, because right now, if you are in mental health crisis or you overdose, our officers really have only two places to take you: to an ER or to jail. And people in mental health crisis or that are battling addiction don't belong in either one of those places. They belong in treatment. And that's what we're so excited about with the ADAMH crisis center. And so by building out these models, funding them, growing them, and expanding them, we think that we're going to better serve the people of Columbus — first of all, getting people what they need when they need it, and also being able to devote more of our police response to fighting violent crime, because that's where our focus needs to be: reducing violent crime, and having other members of the collaborative effort helping to take care of folks who have mental health crisis or they're battling addiction.
Tim Fulton What other thing, other than policing? Violence, and it's a big issue.
Andrew Ginther Sure, huge issue. I think it's the number one issue. And it's one that takes up the overwhelming majority of the city budget. And we've seen some success. We had, in 2020 to 2021, a 33% reduction in homicide and violent crime. It's picked up a little bit this year — we have about 10 more homicides as of today than we did a year ago. But one of the things that is particularly disturbing is the amount of homicides as a result of domestic violence situations. So this year, I think we're at about 18 homicides as a result of domestic violence situations. So sometimes that's parent-child, sometimes it's intimate partner, or husband-wife. But also this year, we've had issues with siblings. And one of the things we're really focused on is, I mean, that's not necessarily a situation that police can prevent or stop, right? We need to make sure that families in crisis — and clearly we have a number of families in crisis — are getting the services and resources that they need, and that folks that are in a domestic violence situation are seeking out the help they need to try to prevent what is maybe a violent situation from becoming a deadly situation. And access to guns and the proliferation of guns — I know we're going to talk a little bit about that, because one of the number one contributors to the spike in violence we've seen is the most reckless and careless gun policy in the state's history. And this isn't just a beginner's assault. This is the overwhelming majority of Ohioans who oppose concealed carry, who oppose stand your ground, who oppose permitless carry. And so law enforcement, prosecutors, gun safety advocates — and all the research shows it isn't about right or left, Republican, Democrat. You go to the Johns Hopkins public health law journal, and you look: the states with the highest rates of violent crime are the states with the most reckless and dangerous gun laws. And so our challenge is this: the state legislature knows what it needs to do. Ninety-two percent of Ohioans support some level of training in order to own a firearm, 75% support uniform background checks, nearly 60% support an assault weapons ban. These are all things that Republicans, Democrats, independents all support. And the legislature refuses to act on what we know is good policy based on evidence and research. At least get out of our way and let cities take the actions that we need to take to protect the people, to protect our officers. We've had more officers assaulted and shot this year than in recent history. And we've got to go after this proliferation of guns that are out there on Columbus streets, and streets around the country.
Tim Fulton And from a policing standpoint, I realize what can happen there to help get rid of guns. I guess I wonder what actions you feel like — I think you just said your hands are tied in terms of not being able to bring up legislation that would make it harder for folks to own guns. Are there action items you feel like you could take?
Andrew Ginther Yeah, and we're going to continue to be creative and innovative. And we're not seeing it, and we're going to fight back. Right now we're in court, as you know, with the state over common-sense safe storage — requiring people, if they have a firearm in the home, that they lock it up and make sure it's out of the hands. But the state is fighting us on that. And we have prevailed before; we hope to prevail again in court. You know, some comments about banning the capacity of large magazines, so that we don't have a semi-automatic become an automatic and have deadly situations where dozens and dozens of people were shot in 30 seconds or less because of large-capacity magazines. So these are very common-sense things that we're putting in place, attempting to do what the state legislature refuses to do — quite honestly, has attempted to preempt us on. But we're not accepting that. We're not standing back and hoping they're going to change their mind. We're going to keep pushing it, we're going to be aggressive.
Tim Fulton I'm going to pivot a little bit to the things that maybe you think that you haven't been successful on over the past eight years. What regrets do you think you have there?
Andrew Ginther Well, there are many regrets. I had mentioned, I think, not meeting the community's expectations back in 2020 with respect to how we handled peaceful protesters. We know there were also people that were doing property damage and assaulting police officers and assaulting others — I'm not talking about those. But how we handled folks who were peacefully protesting and demonstrating and advocating their First Amendment rights. And so you've seen a huge shift in the way that we handle large crowds and protests. Part of that is under the advice and guidance of Dr. Clifford Stott, that I mentioned, who's at the Glenn College; obviously complying and following the Marbley decision from Judge Marbley, and other changes that we made just based on best practices, and certainly with our new chief of police, who handled things very differently in her role when she was with Detroit and obviously wanted to see what best practices look like from across the country. I think one of the other things that I really had hoped to make more progress on — although I'm very proud of our record on housing — is having more partners in the region joining this effort. We've made some good progress. We have folks now in Franklin County and the adjacent counties talking about housing. We have, for the first time ever, secured a quarter of a billion dollars in two separate bond packages, voted authority to use capital funds toward affordable housing and getting more housing units going. But as you know, we've had a supply problem. Before the Great Recession, we've had only about half the number of units coming to market, at all price points, right? Because we need market rate, we need workforce attainable, and we need affordable. And I want us to dramatically double the number of units coming to market every year for the next 15 years, and collectively invest a billion dollars in getting more units to the market. Because we know that because of the supply problem, the folks that are feeling the squeeze the most with respect to rents — and certainly valuations, price points, and appraisals — have been folks on the lower earning income level. So those folks that have any increase or increased valuation and costs associated with that — 15% or 20% — it is really squeezing those folks. So we need more of everything coming to market, and creating that pipeline. One of the biggest pieces to that is also changing our zoning code. We're rewriting our zoning code for the first time in 70 years. Think about where Columbus was 70 years ago, think about where we are today. It is going to really be challenging. There's a reason folks haven't rewritten this in 70 years. And we're going to have to increase density, we're going to have to embrace height, because those are the two major contributors to affordability. I would argue that this region has had a sprawl strategy for the last 40 years. It hasn't necessarily served us well, and it's certainly not sustainable if we're going to grow by a third more people in the region over the next 20 or 30 years. So we're making some progress there. I wish we were further along on the housing front, but I'm really hopeful that there is going to be a regional housing collaborative, because the city of Columbus can't solve the housing challenges of the region all by ourselves. We need our suburban neighbors in Franklin County and the adjacent counties to join us in this effort.
Tim Fulton I guess I'm curious. So just to boil down what I just heard: it's partnerships, it's investment, and zoning. I guess my curiosity and concern is, at what point are we too late? At what point are we Austin? And, like, the ground was broken on Intel. Is it coming far enough, quick enough, for us not to experience a real problem?
Andrew Ginther So just to put it in perspective, I think there were about 12,000 housing units — we've been averaging about 12,000 housing units coming to market every year for the last 10 or 15 years. Austin has 40,000. We need to double the number of units just to maintain the certain level of affordability that we have now.
Tim Fulton We had a problem before Intel. Yes, got it.
Andrew Ginther And my challenge has been, you know, as mayor for the last eight years, I feel like I've been talking about housing for eight years, but it was only until Intel and Honda and LG that folks, I feel like, started talking about it and paying attention to it and realizing that we have to do something. I would argue that one of the things that is really important is the business community now views housing as a huge economic development issue. Because if you're a major employer that's coming to Central Ohio, and you want to attract the best and the brightest from around the country and the world, they need some place to live, and a place that they can afford, in a neighborhood with amenities that they desire. And so housing has gone from something that some folks were interested in — maybe more in the nonprofit, higher ed, planning, and development realms — to now CEOs and corporate leaders saying, this is a threat to our economic future, from a job development or economic development, job creation standpoint. If we don't have more housing of all types available — we just believe passionately that if you work in this region, you ought to be able to live here too. Whether you drive a bus, whether you run a company, whether you teach school, whether you're taking care of my mom and dad in a senior center, there's a place for you in this community. And we have a lot of work to do.
Tim Fulton Do you see the business community stepping up?
Andrew Ginther I do. I do. I think in particular, Steve Steinour, our Huntington, has been a very passionate, strong leader in the housing effort. Kenny McDonald has been part of this regional housing; he's the president and CEO of the Columbus Partnership. He's been working closely with the Affordable Housing Trust and other community partners around this regional housing collaborative. And so obviously we've got great advocates in this community — CEOs and business leaders, whether it's Tanny Crane or other business leaders that are engaged in this work. So I'm hopeful. But to answer the question you asked earlier, I think we really — the next five to 10 years are going to be absolutely critical, and probably closer to five than 10. I mean, we have to move with a sense of urgency and purpose, but also resiliency, because this is the challenge: when you're rewriting zoning codes and making very difficult decisions that involve most people's largest investment — right, their home — there are going to be setbacks, there are going to be challenges. There are a lot of people that are going to have a very vested interest in keeping things the way they are. But that's not the way we want Columbus. We don't just want to be bigger, I want to be better. And that means we're going to have to make difficult decisions around land use, around density, around height, around transit — you know, with the LinkUS initiative that we're hoping to put back on the ballot in the fall of November 2024, that is going to be a game changer for our community. We need to invest in ourselves now, so that we can leave our kids and our grandkids the type of community that they're going to raise their kids in.
Tim Fulton In addition to the matters you've already brought up, talk to me about basically making the choice to run again, and what you hope to accomplish during that time.
Andrew Ginther Yeah, I take this very seriously. And as we talked about, the last couple of years in leadership, leadership has been very lonely — probably not nearly as lonely as any other time in our city's history, some of the most challenging times. And so I spent some time with this. About a year or so ago, I really thought about it, because I think you've got to be all in when you're running for mayor. There may be other elected offices you can run for, but if you're running for mayor, you've got to be all in, and you've got to be all in for the next four years. And so after I thought through it and made my decision, I went to my wife and daughter, because they've been through a lot too over the last four years, and have seen some things that they've never seen before, and some challenges. And they've seen their husband and their father go through some things that no other mayor has ever gone through. And so I talked with them about their support for running for a third term. So I'm really excited. I am really excited. Never been more bullish and hopeful about Columbus's future. I believe that we are in a special moment in our city's history, where if we make the right decisions — they're going to be difficult, they're going to be challenging, we're going to make mistakes — but if we make a concerted effort and commitment to one another, that we're going to do what's in the community's best interest, and we're going to invest in our people and our neighborhoods and a better quality of life, we're on a pretty incredible trajectory to, again, not just grow for the sake of growth, not just be bigger, but better, and to manage a tremendous amount of growth in a relatively short period of time, in a thoughtful, equitable, progressive way.
Tim Fulton Okay, harkening back to the focus areas that you had before, around policing, around guns, around gun violence, around violence in general. It strikes me a bit that I've seen a campaign from you before that was much more focused on neighborhoods, and basically the good — the investments and the personality of the city. And now, having to focus on policing, violence, the more difficult and certainly challenging things — the positive and the negative. I'm curious if you feel that way, if you feel like you've had to pivot in that way.
Andrew Ginther Well, when you're the mayor, you have it all on your plate. And I still believe my top three priorities are neighborhoods, neighborhoods, neighborhoods. Now, we may have been talking about decades of disinvestment in neighborhoods that had been left out, left behind of Columbus's success story. And I've been very purposeful and intentional about lifting those up — you know, Linden, the Hilltop, and our next area of focus is going to be that Eastland area. And equity is not equality. There are some in our community that want everything to be split up evenly, and let everybody do the best they can with what they have and hope for the best. What I've called for through the equity agenda and Opportunity Rising is to be very purposeful and intentional: we're going to invest more in neighbors and neighborhoods that have been left out and left behind. And so that isn't necessarily a value shared by everybody. I have been openly criticized for focusing so much on Linden and the Hilltop and the South Side, and that's okay, because I mean, it's very purposeful and intentional. And that's where I'm going to continue to invest. We're going to continue to provide great city services throughout our city, but we're going to be very focused on these neighborhoods that quite honestly haven't shared in the same levels of economic success as the rest of the city. Now, that extends to safety, right? So not only do you have the One Linden plan, where public and private and everyone have invested at this point $150 million, when you take a look at all the investments — from the Linden Community Center, the redesign of Hudson Avenue, the Habitat for Humanity investments, Nationwide Children's Hospital — that extends to the South Side. Envision Hilltop is a plan, and both of those plans were created by and driven by the neighborhoods, because we thought it was critically important. We were coming up with neighborhood plans that were owned by the community, that they weren't dropped in at city hall in different diverse neighborhoods throughout the city. And Envision Hilltop has already seen the Hilltop early childhood center that's going to offer 200 high-quality preschool spots right there. One of the poorest-enrolled preschool areas of the city, the fewest amount of spots available, were over on the Hilltop. And to have that place open and now taking in kids and helping to get them ready for kindergarten at Highland, at John Burroughs, and other elementary schools on the Hilltop — you know, we're really proud of that. And we're going to continue to invest in neighborhoods, as well as neighborhood safety, to make sure that we're honoring our commitments.
Tim Fulton I end every interview with two questions, juxtaposing them. One, what do you think Columbus is doing well? And what do you think Columbus is doing not so well?
Andrew Ginther I would still argue that Columbus is doing very well at our collaboration, cooperation, partnership. You know, I am very engaged with the Central Ohio Mayors and City Managers Association, the Ohio Mayors Alliance, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors. And there are many mayors from around the country that are envious of our ability. Not only can we get the public sector and the private sector in the room — there are some communities around the country where you can't get the city and the county in the room, even if they're all the same party, certainly not the city, the county, and the state, where they may be of different parties, and then you have the private sector and higher ed and nonprofits. I think there are a lot of places in the country — they talk to me all the time, and I know business leaders from around the country that come in here all the time, and higher ed and nonprofit leaders, that talk about this collaboration, this commitment to the greater good, on behalf of the community, which I think is going to serve us well. It's served us well for economic development, it's served us well for neighborhood development. I think it's going to serve us exceptionally well with this great challenge around housing and transit in the years ahead. I would say the other challenge — because growth has happened relatively slowly, minimally, and consistently for the last 70 years — creating that sense of urgency has been challenging, because as we said earlier, I think we do have this five-to-10-year window. This is a critically important time and window to make some very difficult decisions. So the time for study and analysis and looking around is over at best. It is time to do, it is time to act. And that isn't to say we're going to be perfect. But the time for studying and designing and analysis for the sake of paralysis is over. It's time to act. And that's the part where I think we need to make some strides in the next 12, 24, 36 months.
Tim Fulton That's fair. You'll get there. Thank you for your time.
Andrew Ginther Thanks for having me. Good to be with you.
Tim Fulton Thank you for listening to the Confluence Cast, presented by Columbus Underground. Again, you can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Please rate, subscribe, share this episode of the Confluence Cast with your friends, family, contacts, enemies, your favorite voter. If you're interested in sponsoring the Confluence Cast, get in touch with us. We can be reached by email at info@theconfluencecast.com. Our theme music was composed by Benji Robinson. Our producer is Phil Cogley. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. Have a great week.
