
Columbus City Charter
The Columbus City Charter is essentially the Columbus Constitution. It defines the structure and role of the city and its leaders. I sat down with the chairman of the most recent comprehensive Charter Review Commission, Mike Curtin, to talk about the origins of our charter, why we have the structure that we do, and his predictions on the future of the city.
Shownotes
- Mike Curtin (Wikipedia)
- The Columbus City Charter
- Columbus Mayor Andrew J. Ginther
- Columbus City Council
- Columbus City Attorney
- Columbus City Auditor
- 2014 Charter Review Commission
- William Oxley Thompson (Wikipedia)
- Washington Gladden (Wikipedia)
- Will Petrik
- Jonathon Beard
Support for this episode of the Confluence Cast comes from Little Rock Bar. Little Rock Bar is located at 944 North Fourth Street in Italian Village. With 30 beers on tap, Little Rock Bar has happyhour from 4 to 8 everyday. Every Tuesday, get $3 draft beers all night while you enjoy Rock Your Cock Off Karaoke. Wednesdays is Everybody’s a Comedian, hosted by Travis Hoewischer, it’s like trivia but you prove your snark instead of smarts. Everyone’s night should have a little rock.
Read the transcript
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Confluence Cast presented by Columbus Underground. We are a weekly Columbus-centric podcast focusing on the civics, lifestyle, entertainment, and people of our city. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. This week, we are getting back to basics. We're doing a survey of the foundation of our city's government. The Columbus City Charter is essentially the Columbus Constitution. I sat down with the chair of the last Comprehensive Charter Review Commission, Mr. Mike Curtin, to talk about why we have the structure that we do in Columbus, what makes Columbus different, why the recent charter amendment proposal floundered. We get Mike Curtin's thoughts on our current system and his predictions for the future of council. You can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Also, the Confluence Cast is on Patreon. Find out how to support this podcast on our website, theconfluencecast.com, or at patreon.com/confluence. The Confluence Cast is sponsored by Little Rock Bar. Little Rock Bar is located at 944 North Fourth Street in Italian Village. With 30 beers on tap, Little Rock Bar has happy hour from 4:00 to 8:00 every day. Every Tuesday is $3 draft beers all night while you enjoy Rock Your Cock Off karaoke. Wednesdays is Everybody's a Comedian hosted by Travis Haywicher. It's like trivia, but you prove your snark instead of smarts. Info, hours, and upcoming events at littlerockbar.net. Everyone's night should have a little rock. Enjoy the interview. Sitting down here with Mike Curtin, the former associate publisher for The Columbus Dispatch, former state representative for the 17th District on the occasion of his co-chairing of the Comprehensive Charter Review Commission in 2014. Today we're gonna talk about the Columbus City Charter. Mike, how are you, sir? I'm doing good, Tim. Thanks for having me. No, thank you so much for making the time. First of all, the Columbus City Charter is essentially the city's constitution. It defines the legal entities under which we're governed and the processes with which those entities use to govern us, correct? That is correct.
Talk about, first of all, some of the things that it defines. It says we have a mayor. It says we have a city council. What's the basic lay of the land there? Well, you're correct. The, the charter is analogous to the U.S. Constitution or the Ohio Constitution. It is essentially the constitution for the city. It lays out, uh, who will be elected: a mayor, a seven-member council, a city attorney, and a city auditor. It specifies the powers and duties of each office. It specifies the qualifications that one must have to run for each of those offices. What are the qualifications needed? I assume that the city attorney has to be an attorney. Yes.
Okay. Uh, other than that, it basically asserts that one must be an elector of the city. Okay. Must reside, uh, within the city, um, which means you have to be 18 years old and, and an elector. The charter also stipulates how these officers can be removed. If we want to remove them, um, by the recall process, we can do that. It specifies how the citizens can take government into their own hands through the initiative process.
Okay. Um- And that's what we think of as a ballot issue? Correct.
Okay. A citizen-initiated ballot issue. The, the charter gives the people the power of the initiative, which is to initiate legislation, the referendum, which is to have an up or down vote on legislation passed by the council, and the recall, which is essentially to impeach one of those elective officers. It stipulates, uh, how legislation is to, is to be considered, that it must be considered on three separate days or three separate readings. Okay. It specifies, uh, how the, uh, mayor's veto, uh, power can be exercised. It specifies how council can override, uh, that veto. So when you think of a city charter, you really should think of it as you described it, as sort of the city's constitution-
Yeah ... laying out the duties and powers of the offices, the balance of power, uh, and how money is to be safeguarded, uh, for example, how bonds can be issued, uh, and so forth and so on. What is unique about Columbus? I've frequently heard it said that we have a strong mayoral system. Our city auditor and our city attorney are both independently elected. From my perception, we have a pretty small council for the size of the city that we have. Can you sort of talk about some of those things? Yes. When, when the Charter Review Commission, uh, was studying our city, and when they decided to come up with the-
And this is yours in 2014? No, this is the one in 1913 and 1914- Oh, okay ... that led to the May 1914 vote that produced the charter that we currently have.
Okay. The big debate in that commission was whether to have a, a federal plan, which is a strong mayor and council, which is what we have, or a commission. And, and they d- long debated having an 11-member to 15-member commission of people who would essentially hire a specialist, like a city manager. Okay. And then hire specialists to run various departments. Uh, that was a very intense argument. They dis- they negotiated and compromised on what is called the federal plan to sort of mirror what we have in Washington, you know, and a, a chief executive, you know, the president-
Mm-hmm ... uh, and a legislative body. And so that's what they came up with. Uh, prior to that, we did have a ward system where we had city council members elected by ward, and, and, and this commission, uh, specified what they thought were a lot of sh- shortcomings of that plan. And so they proposed in the charter going to what they called the federal plan, uh, an elected mayor, a strong mayor, a seven-member council with each of the seven members elected at large, and two independently elected office holders, an auditor, who would be the chief accounting officer, and an attorney, who would be the chief law officer, uh, for a strong checks and balances system. And I think what is somewhat unique about Ohio, especially within, uh, uh, I, um, Columbus, within the state of Ohio, is, um, the amount of checks and balances, and to your point, a relatively small council now- Mm-hmm ... for a city that's exceeded 800,000 population and, uh, is rapidly headed toward a million population.
Do we have evidence of the deliberations from that charter review in 1913? We have newspaper accounts. Okay. Uh, I've not seen minutes-
Okay ... of, of the, of that Charter Review Commission from 1913 and '14, but it was co-chaired by two very notable people. One, uh, William Oxley Thompson, who was then president for The Ohio State University. Yes. And Washington Gladden, who was a renowned, um, reformer and a renowned national leader in the Progressive Movement, who was pastor of the First, uh, Congregational Church.
Huh. Um, and those two people co-chaired the, uh, review commission and put forward what they thought was a very, um, progressive document for its time. What did they view as the shortcomings for the ward system that we were in before? A lot of horse trading. Uh, a lot of, uh... We had in the late 1890s a, a 15-member council-
Okay ... uh, with 12 members elected by wards and three elected at large. Um, at one point, we even had a 38-member council earlier in the 1890s. You know, 19 wards, two members per ward for 38 members. Uh, they thought that council- And this was a city of population of...? Oh, in the 1890s? Uh, I couldn't tell you offhand.
Okay. I'd have to go look it up. Okay. But obviously it was fairly small. But-
I'm not here to quiz you, but- Yeah, by, by today's standards. They saw a corrupt city. They saw a, a city with a lot of vice, uh, especially a lot of houses of prostitution and gambling houses. They saw a corrupt police department- Okay ... that was in, in bed, if you will, with the, uh, with the, uh, leaders of, uh, of these vice enterprises. They saw basically a weak council.
Okay. You know, a members-by-district- Because of its distribution, essentially. Well, members who did not have the entire city's interests at heart-
Okay ... you know, who were only concerned about their own district and therefore led to a lot of horse trading, a lot of log rolling with other members. Mm-hmm. Uh, a lot of self-interest, if you will. Um, but they basically saw a city that was not on the move, uh, compared to other cities.
Okay. And so they studied city administration plans from across the country and thought that this plan we have now was what we should go with. Okay. How is it a strong mayoral city? Is it because of that federalist structure, basically? Yes. The mayor, as the, as the chief executive of the executive branch, essentially has a point of authority over, uh, all the departments. So he appoints a safety director, he appoints a service director, you know, he appoints, you know, directors of all the city departments. Uh, and so that's, uh, a lot of power-
That's where that strength lies ... to give one elected official, and that's, uh, uh, unlike a lot of cities that have a city manager form of plan. Mm-hmm. Um, we've always had the strong mayor system since 1916. Uh, the executive branch clearly is the dominant branch in, in Columbus because the city is so large and there are so many departments to run.
What do you attribute that difference to from our charter system to other cities? Um- Or do you have an opinion on it? What do I think are the merits and demerits of, of-
Yeah ... of a... Well, when you're, when you're electing only seven members at large, a- and every voter can vote on each and every one of those seven members, you know, clearly you're incentivizing a member to be beholden to the entire city- Mm-hmm ... and not just to one neighborhood or, or a congregation of neighborhoods. Uh, I think historically that's been a plus.
Okay. Because if you look at Columbus relative to its peer cities, or any cities, quite frankly, in the Midwest or across the country, if on an economic health basis, we're doing awfully well. Mm-hmm. Uh, we're en- envied by m- by most cities in Ohio and by lots of cities across the country for our economic health. So clearly the system we have hasn't hurt us.
Mm-hmm. Um, uh, a downside is when you get as large as we've gotten, it's hard for a, a one, uh, council member among seven- Mm-hmm ... to be in tune and in touch with, um, a- A city as diverse-
Mm-hmm ... as we are. These are statutorily part-time council members. Right. Um, most of them, uh, are expected to have another job. This is a big burden. Um, it's a lot to put on a, a member. And the critics of the current system, uh, say that, um, when you're electing seven members at large in this day and age, it becomes a big money game.
Okay. That you simply can't break through unless you're part of a party machine- Right ... unless you're financed by the big money people in town. And there's merit to that argument.
Yeah. These are very expensive races. It's hard for the so-called little guy, you know, to, uh, to have a chance of getting elected if you're not, you know, part of the inside circle that, quite frankly, is, uh, very much in tune with the, the chief economic interests of the city. Mm-hmm. Talk about the charter review commission that you co-chaired in 2014, what it was tasked with, and what changes you guys actually made. It was the last time that there was a comprehensive review of the charter. We had a five-member commission appointed by the mayor and the city council, uh, to review the entirety of the charter from start to finish and to make recommendations, uh, to council to go to, uh, the electorate with some, um, updates. Uh, it had been many years since there had been a, a thorough review of the charter.
Mm-hmm. So a lot of what we recommended, quite frankly, was getting old, antiquated language out- Okay ... and to update the, uh-
Simply cleaning house, if you will. Cleaning house. I mean, for example, the, the recall procedure that was, uh, that was, uh, in the charter, uh, before the fall of 2014 required that anyone, uh, wanting to recall a city official had to post, uh, notices of recall in all the firehouses of the city. Uh, well, the firehouses of the city back in the day were, were gathering places where people- Right ... would go to read the bulletin board and so forth. Well, that was clearly a, an outdated, you know, mode of, uh, of recalling an elected official. So most of what we recommended and the voters adopted in, in 2014 in, in three ballot issues that packaged, uh, about 14 or 15, uh, items to- total, uh, were, were cleanup mechanisms-
Okay ... more than anything else, and streamlining mechanisms and making sure that if you wanted to take advantage, um, uh, of the initiative or, uh, the recall, that there was a streamlined way to do it. The voters also approved a recommendation we made, uh, for judging the incapacity of a elected official, uh, or mayor or council members or auditor or attorney if they became incapacitated. Okay. If physically or mentally there was no mechanism in the charter.
It just basically said incapacitated and that wasn't defined? There was no defined process- Okay ... for how their colleagues could, could deal with that incapac-
Just out of interest, what is the process- ... incapacitation ... for that? I would have to go back and read the, the charter. It basically, uh, uses a probate-like procedure.
Okay. There would be an independent evaluation of the competency of the member. Let's assume, for example, uh, God forbid that we had a, uh, a long-serving elected official who, um, uh, became senile, had, um, something like Alzheimer's- Mm-hmm ... uh, and didn't know it.
And insisted on remaining. Right. Uh, we now have in the charter a provision, you know, whereby that elected officer could be evaluated. Gotcha.
And if need be, we, we could take that person out. Now, what about a recall? Has that ever happened in Columbus? I am not aware of an actual recall having happened. It certainly hasn't happened in modern times. Okay. What is the process for it?
You circulate petitions. You gather signatures of registered voters, um, of a certain threshold, and once you gather enough signatures and they are validated by the Board of Elections, you can basically have a, a measure go on the ballot that simply says, "Should this elected official be, uh, retained or not retained?" It's essentially the same as a citizen-led ballot initiative. It, it is. It's a, it's, it's a cit- citizen-led, um, it's an impeachment procedure, basically. One that doesn't have to define this is why. It, it simply is a, a confidence vote, right?
That is correct. If you think somebody's doing a horrible job, if you think somebody is, um, deaf to the, the concerns of the, uh, of the electorate, you can circulate a recall petition. And if you get a sufficient number of signatures, get it on the ballot, and have an up or down vote on whether that person continues in office. I wanna get into sort of the district versus ward system. We're sitting down here literally the day after city council tabled their previous initiative as recommended by this last year's, uh, charter review commission. But I wanna talk about first, how does the charter review process work? There are open meetings, but how do you sort of address those, the issues? Do you just sort of do a reading and then bring in experts to consult with? Well, the most recent review of the charter was by a committee and not a commission, and the distinction being the committee that recommended we change the structure of city council was charged with reviewing only Section 3 of the charter. Got it.
Section 3 of the charter is the section on the legislative branch and how, how it's composed. So that wasn't a full commission that looked at the entire charter. I see. Okay. It w- it was a s- committee tasked only with looking at Section 3. Okay.
And, uh, that committee saw merit in retaining at large elections, allowing every voter to vote for every council member. Mm-hmm. But also thought there was merit in having council members, uh, essentially keenly focused on one district. Mm-hmm.
And so that committee recommended expanding the current council from seven members to nine- Right ... um, and requiring each of those nine to come from a specific district. So it was essentially a proposal to create a residency requirement- Mm-hmm
... whereby you would have to reside within one of these nine Districts to be able to, uh, run for that district seat on council. But once you qualified for the ballot through the primary, then, uh, you would actually be voted on by every, uh, voter in the city. Right. So it was sort of a hybrid, uh, proposal, and there aren't, there aren't many of these. There are a few of these out West, uh, I believe in Arizona and maybe one other Western state. Mm-hmm.
So it was a, um, interesting proposal, and council clearly was divided by it. It's my understanding that, um, four members, uh, were ready to vote to put it on the ballot, and three members were not. Okay. And so there was still a lot of division within council, uh, about the, the merits of going forward now. And so rather than having a four-three vote a- and showing that kind of split- Right
... uh, they decided to go back to the kitchen and try to, um, have a deeper look. Well, in my time, it is a pretty united council, at least since the mid-1990s. It, it, it is, and depending on your view, that can be a strength or a weakness. Mm-hmm.
Uh, s- a lot of the folks who, um, who are the harshest critics of this council, you know, believe it's, it's too cocooned, that they, they, they, they work in cahoots too much, that, uh, showing some division, s- showing some difference of opinion when it comes to vote on things is healthy- Mm-hmm ... not unhealthy, and that we should have a little bit more of a, um, you know, healthy debate in front of the public on these measures- Yeah
... uh, rather than- Well, 'cause it's what brings those issues to the fore, right? If you're simply presenting a one-sided argument, you're not discussing the other side of it. And if you're not an elected official, is The Columbus Dispatch gonna go out and try to get a quote from the other side? Well, i- in, on this issue, I believe The Dispatch has. Mm-hmm.
Um, I, I do believe that, um, uh, people like Will Patrick, who's running for council this fall- Mm-hmm ... uh, people like Jonathan Beard, who has sponsored and who has spearheaded, uh, initiatives to change the composition of council in the past- Which many would argue is the reason why this committee came-
Sure ... about in the first place. Oh, oh, absolutely. I think, I think the work, you know, done by the Jonathan Beards and the Will Patricks and others who are the, among the harshest critics of the current composition of council- Mm-hmm
... uh, clearly that spurred, uh, council wanting to, to give this issue a thorough review, uh, invite as many voices in as possible, and, uh, see where the discussion led. Right. Uh, it's obvious from reading the paper that this process has not pacified, uh, those critics- No
... at all. They still see it as a totally inside baseball game, and, uh, they would like to, to go to a true district system. Mm-hmm. We'll see where that goes. I mean, as you know, it was on the ballot in August of 2016- Yeah
... in a special election, which was unfortunate because you only had about a 9% turnout- Right ... that election. But it went down about 72 to 28. And so if one of the- Were you surprised by that?
Somewhat. Okay. I w- I, I was blown away that through a special election, there was so much of an anti-vote.
Yeah. Well, um, there was a, there was a campaign conducted against it. Mm-hmm. Um, there wasn't much money, uh, s- uh, you know, in a campaign to support it. Uh, and usually in, in special elections, your, your, your hardest core voters come out, and those are people who tend to be more aligned with the status quo, I think. Okay.
Um, and quite frankly, uh, and I've been in Columbus for 65 years, you know, all of my life, and, uh, I, I've not seen a organic, you know, authentic grassroots impetus out there for change. You know? Mm-hmm. Where's, where's the voice for change? It's, it's fairly small, if you ask me. It's not broad-based. And so if one's trying to defend the status quo, and I'm not. I mean, I think any, any system can work. Right.
It, it, the real question is who you elect- Right ... uh, to make that system work. Any system can work, and cities across the country show that any system can work. It's really, I think, what type of behavior do you want to incentivize? Mm-hmm.
Uh, different systems incentivize different behaviors. What is the process that that committee and your commission went through to s- to evaluate? Do you benchmark against other cities? Yes. The commission I was on met for over a four-month period, and through city council staff, commissioned a lot of research- Okay
... to show how we compared and contrasted with other cities in Ohio and other cities across the country, um, in terms of the major provisions of the charter. So it was a deep dive, and, uh, we, we read reams and reams of, uh, research documents in considering what we might recommend in the way of change. The current, uh, committee or the recently, uh, impaneled committee only looked at the composition of council. Right. And they held hearings throughout the city, uh, most of which were very, very poorly attended. Mm-hmm.
Uh, I went to a couple of them and, you know, there were maybe a handful of people in the audience. Okay. Which again speaks to my earlier point of, you know, where's the- Where is this grassroots uprising?
Yeah. Where, where is the call for change? It's, it's fairly, uh, narrow and deep- Mm-hmm ... as opposed to being widespread, I think. And so that's one of the things that's given pause to this council, I believe. You know? Uh, there's a debate going on, I think, over there at, uh, 90 West Broad- Uh-huh
... over who are we responding to, you know? Is there really a momentum out there for change, or are we just going through all this to, um, uh- To supplicate a couple of people? Yeah. Can I ask your commission, while it was seated in order to... I think the stated intention was to simply update a lot of the language that was in the charter, why you guys didn't make more changes to it? Or was that simply not part of what you were impaneled to do?
We were not asked to recommend specific changes. Okay. Uh, we did, uh, quite frankly shy away from the question of composition of council- Okay
... because we knew that was on a separate track. You know, we knew that, uh, there were, uh- Even in 2014? Oh, yes. Okay.
Yeah. You know, we knew there were efforts being made to, um- Qualify an initiative for the ballot. And so we thought, "Well, that's gonna take care of itself." Okay. It looked as though the momentum was there from this group to qualify an initiative and rather than, you know, get in its way- Right
... rather than look like we were trying to compete with it, let that effort run its course. Or preempt it, really. Yeah, we didn't wanna preempt it. Right.
You know, we really didn't want to, um, look as though we were a vehicle for trying to neuter, you know, that, that effort. Um, that was running on a separate track. So we, we shied away from it, and we really focused on recommendations that we thought would, you know, clean up a nearly century-old document. And there were a lot of cobwebs. Right. There was a lot of arcane language. There was a lot of sexist language- Okay
... uh, referring to he's all the time. Right. You have to remember this charter predated women having the vote. Right.
Uh, women didn't get to vote until 1920. This charter, uh, was voted on in 1914. Mm-hmm. So there was just a lot of old, uh, cobwebs to clean out, quite frankly, and that's what we did. There, there was a lot we did not need to change. Okay.
And one of the beauties of our city charter is a lot of it has served us well for a century. I would argue that having an independently elected city attorney- Okay ... is a huge advantage for Columbus. Talk about what the virtue of that is.
Uh, a city attorney who is beholden to the voters and not to the mayor or council. Mm-hmm. In most cities, the chief legal officer is an appointee of the mayor or the- And so can be instructed to work for the mayor, basically.
Yes, can be instructed to do this and not do that. Our city attorney, as an independently elected office holder, is beholden to the electorate, and if he has to deliver some unwelcome news to the mayor, he can do it or she can do it. We've had both male and female city attorneys. Same thing with the city auditor. We haven't had a female city auditor, but the city auditor by charter is a chief accounting officer, uh, of the city, and Hugh Dorian, who's filled that role now for a half century- Mm-hmm ... is famously independent for letting both Republican and Democratic mayors over his long tenure know when he disagreed with them. Okay.
For example, when Tom Moody, uh, in the 1970s, was hell-bent on getting a trash-burning power plant- Okay ... which went on to be the biggest white elephant that this city has ever sponsored- Okay
... 'cause the thing never worked right. It was a, it was a multi, multi-hundred of millions of, millions of dollar boondoggle. You know, Hugh Dorian, our city auditor, was saying, "I oppose this because it's not financially stable- Okay ... and it's not financially proven, and I think we're making an awfully big bet here that we're likely to lose." But in the end, the mayor can push that through if they want.
Well, the mayor, the mayor put a bond issue on the ballot, um, that the voters approved- Mm-hmm ... uh, in 1977, which paved the way for the construction of a trash-burning power plant that never worked. Okay.
And, uh, a city auditor or, or a chief accounting officer appointed by the mayor would never have had the independence and the, uh, cojones, if you will, you know, to, uh, say, "Mayor, I disagree with you," and to publicly disagree. Right. The public never would've heard about it, basically. The public never would've heard about that. Right.
And so, uh, whether it was a trash-burning power plant or whether it was Hugh Dorian, uh, publicly, uh, informing Mayor Coleman a few years ago they were spending money too fast. Okay. You know, we had a city income tax cr- in- tax increase in 2009- Mm-hmm
... when it went from 2% to 2.5% of the city income tax. And after, uh, several years, uh, City Auditor Dorian wrote a memo to the mayor, which of course became public and- Public record, right ... it became a, uh, story on the front page of The Dispatch saying, "We're burning through this money awfully quickly, and if, if you're not careful, we'll have spent this entire increase in a matter of a few years." And that was a wake-up call to the mayor. It was a wake-up call to the city, and quite frankly, it prompted a, uh, expenditure review committee to, uh, start, um, looking at how they could curtail the increase in city general fund spending. If you don't have an independent chief accounting officer- Mm-hmm
... that never would've happened. So those are two examples where Columbus is very well served by this charter and those two independently elected offices. Have there been public conflicts between the city attorney and the mayor? Um, there have been some. They are usually behind the scenes- Okay
... and not public because the city attorney has a legal fiduciary obligation to his clients. His clients are the, uh, other city officials. Right. The city attorney, you know, represents the mayor just like an, a private attorney would represent you. Right.
And so even though that attorney is beholden to the, to the voters, that city attorney also has a, uh, legal fiduciary obligation to the mayor, to council, to not go out of his way, you know, to embarrass them. Right. So there's... He must walk a line- Right
... on the one hand being independent, on the other hand advising his clients in a way that is in their best interest. And so it, it's rare to have a real big public clash between your city attorney and your other city office holders. If you had a crystal ball, do you think that there will be significant changes to the charter, let's say, within the next five years, and specifically to the composition of council? I think we'll see a change within the next five years- Okay
... uh, of one kind or another, simply because a seven-member, part-time, at-large council has a hard time representing a city that's rapidly approaching one million people. Mm-hmm. It, it's... There has to be some give one way or another. I believe the council will either grow to 9 or 11 members and, and remain at large- Okay
... or there will, or it will grow and we will have sort of, some sort of hybrid plan that combines districts with at large. But Everything changes over time. It may take 100 years for things to change- Yeah ... as it has in this case. But it's hard for me to envision a seven-member at-large council being in place five, 10, 20 years from now. Do you think that there's better ways or different ways, speaking to you with your background both as a public official from the 17th House District and from your background at The Dispatch, are there things that you believe council should be doing to address some of the, the pain points that were brought up in the citizen-led ballot issue in 2016, like neighborhoods not getting the attention they deserve?
Well, I think one thing we can do, and a number of people have discussed this, is to strengthen the area commissions. Mm-hmm. Um, Columbus has had a network of area commissions going back to the 1970s. Uh, a city with the kinda size and diversity that Columbus has, uh, needs many councils, if you will- Mm-hmm
... which area commissions are- Right ... to focus specifically on, uh, the needs, the strengths and weaknesses of those areas. But they are simply tasked with making recommendations to council.
They, they, they only have recommending authority, but some of those commissions are extremely influential. Mm-hmm. The Clintonville Area Commission, for example, long has been extremely influential. If you're a developer wanting to develop something in Clintonville, you don't wanna run afoul of the Clintonville Area Commission. Right.
You know, they make recommendations that are taken very seriously by city council and the mayor. Um, other areas of town have had, um, mixed success with commissions, some with strong commissions, some with weak, and some with, or don't even have commissions now. Right. But I, I think, um, a bona fide, authentic attempt to make sure that each area of town has a civic body- Mm-hmm
... you know, an area commission, a civic association that has, uh, real power, that has a recommending authority that's taken seriously by City Hall, uh, is one way, uh, and a pr- a time-proven way- Mm-hmm ... you know, to address local, local needs, if you will. Right.
And if we do get to councils by district at some point, I would hope that the boundaries of those council districts would be coterminous. Okay. Would be in sync with boundaries of a number of these area commissions and civic associations. It would make no sense to balkanize the city, to have council districts that weren't in conformance- Right
... with neighborhood, you know, commission and area commission, uh, districts. I think great care should be taken if and when we have council by districts to make sure those districts a, align with each other so, uh, we don't have a s- gerrymandering at the city level. Absolutely. Mike, thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it. Thank you for having me. It's been a privilege. Thank you for listening to the Confluence Cast presented by Columbus Underground. Again, you can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Please rate, subscribe, share this episode of The Confluence Cast with your friends, family, contacts, enemies, your favorite civil servant. If you're interested in sponsoring The Confluence Cast, get in touch with us. We can be reached by email at info@theconfluencecast.com. Our theme music was composed by Benji Robinson. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. Have a great week.
Transcript5,838 words
Tim Fulton Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Confluence Cast presented by Columbus Underground. We are a weekly Columbus-centric podcast focusing on the civics, lifestyle, entertainment, and people of our city. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. This week, we are getting back to basics. We're doing a survey of the foundation of our city's government. The Columbus City Charter is essentially the Columbus Constitution. I sat down with the chair of the last Comprehensive Charter Review Commission, Mr. Mike Curtin, to talk about why we have the structure that we do in Columbus, what makes Columbus different, why the recent charter amendment proposal floundered. We get Mike Curtin's thoughts on our current system and his predictions for the future of council. You can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Also, the Confluence Cast is on Patreon. Find out how to support this podcast on our website, theconfluencecast.com, or at patreon.com/confluence. The Confluence Cast is sponsored by Little Rock Bar. Little Rock Bar is located at 944 North Fourth Street in Italian Village. With 30 beers on tap, Little Rock Bar has happy hour from 4:00 to 8:00 every day. Every Tuesday is $3 draft beers all night while you enjoy Rock Your Cock Off karaoke. Wednesdays is Everybody's a Comedian hosted by Travis Haywicher. It's like trivia, but you prove your snark instead of smarts. Info, hours, and upcoming events at littlerockbar.net. Everyone's night should have a little rock. Enjoy the interview. Sitting down here with Mike Curtin, the former associate publisher for The Columbus Dispatch, former state representative for the 17th District on the occasion of his co-chairing of the Comprehensive Charter Review Commission in 2014. Today we're gonna talk about the Columbus City Charter. Mike, how are you, sir?
Mike Curtin I'm doing good, Tim. Thanks for having me.
Tim Fulton No, thank you so much for making the time. First of all, the Columbus City Charter is essentially the city's constitution. It defines the legal entities under which we're governed and the processes with which those entities use to govern us, correct?
Mike Curtin That is correct.
Tim Fulton Talk about, first of all, some of the things that it defines. It says we have a mayor. It says we have a city council. What's the basic lay of the land there?
Mike Curtin Well, you're correct. The, the charter is analogous to the U.S. Constitution or the Ohio Constitution. It is essentially the constitution for the city. It lays out, uh, who will be elected: a mayor, a seven-member council, a city attorney, and a city auditor. It specifies the powers and duties of each office. It specifies the qualifications that one must have to run for each of those offices.
Tim Fulton What are the qualifications needed? I assume that the city attorney has to be an attorney.
Mike Curtin Yes.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Uh, other than that, it basically asserts that one must be an elector of the city.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Must reside, uh, within the city, um, which means you have to be 18 years old and, and an elector. The charter also stipulates how these officers can be removed. If we want to remove them, um, by the recall process, we can do that. It specifies how the citizens can take government into their own hands through the initiative process.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Um-
Tim Fulton And that's what we think of as a ballot issue?
Mike Curtin Correct.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin A citizen-initiated ballot issue. The, the charter gives the people the power of the initiative, which is to initiate legislation, the referendum, which is to have an up or down vote on legislation passed by the council, and the recall, which is essentially to impeach one of those elective officers. It stipulates, uh, how legislation is to, is to be considered, that it must be considered on three separate days or three separate readings.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin It specifies, uh, how the, uh, mayor's veto, uh, power can be exercised. It specifies how council can override, uh, that veto. So when you think of a city charter, you really should think of it as you described it, as sort of the city's constitution-
Tim Fulton Yeah
Mike Curtin ... laying out the duties and powers of the offices, the balance of power, uh, and how money is to be safeguarded, uh, for example, how bonds can be issued, uh, and so forth and so on.
Tim Fulton What is unique about Columbus? I've frequently heard it said that we have a strong mayoral system. Our city auditor and our city attorney are both independently elected. From my perception, we have a pretty small council for the size of the city that we have. Can you sort of talk about some of those things?
Mike Curtin Yes. When, when the Charter Review Commission, uh, was studying our city, and when they decided to come up with the-
Tim Fulton And this is yours in 2014?
Mike Curtin No, this is the one in 1913 and 1914-
Tim Fulton Oh, okay
Mike Curtin ... that led to the May 1914 vote that produced the charter that we currently have.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin The big debate in that commission was whether to have a, a federal plan, which is a strong mayor and council, which is what we have, or a commission. And, and they d- long debated having an 11-member to 15-member commission of people who would essentially hire a specialist, like a city manager.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin And then hire specialists to run various departments. Uh, that was a very intense argument. They dis- they negotiated and compromised on what is called the federal plan to sort of mirror what we have in Washington, you know, and a, a chief executive, you know, the president-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... uh, and a legislative body. And so that's what they came up with. Uh, prior to that, we did have a ward system where we had city council members elected by ward, and, and, and this commission, uh, specified what they thought were a lot of sh- shortcomings of that plan. And so they proposed in the charter going to what they called the federal plan, uh, an elected mayor, a strong mayor, a seven-member council with each of the seven members elected at large, and two independently elected office holders, an auditor, who would be the chief accounting officer, and an attorney, who would be the chief law officer, uh, for a strong checks and balances system. And I think what is somewhat unique about Ohio, especially within, uh, uh, I, um, Columbus, within the state of Ohio, is, um, the amount of checks and balances, and to your point, a relatively small council now-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... for a city that's exceeded 800,000 population and, uh, is rapidly headed toward a million population.
Tim Fulton Do we have evidence of the deliberations from that charter review in 1913?
Mike Curtin We have newspaper accounts.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Uh, I've not seen minutes-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... of, of the, of that Charter Review Commission from 1913 and '14, but it was co-chaired by two very notable people. One, uh, William Oxley Thompson, who was then president for The Ohio State University.
Tim Fulton Yes.
Mike Curtin And Washington Gladden, who was a renowned, um, reformer and a renowned national leader in the Progressive Movement, who was pastor of the First, uh, Congregational Church.
Tim Fulton Huh.
Mike Curtin Um, and those two people co-chaired the, uh, review commission and put forward what they thought was a very, um, progressive document for its time.
Tim Fulton What did they view as the shortcomings for the ward system that we were in before?
Mike Curtin A lot of horse trading. Uh, a lot of, uh... We had in the late 1890s a, a 15-member council-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... uh, with 12 members elected by wards and three elected at large. Um, at one point, we even had a 38-member council earlier in the 1890s. You know, 19 wards, two members per ward for 38 members. Uh, they thought that council-
Tim Fulton And this was a city of population of...?
Mike Curtin Oh, in the 1890s? Uh, I couldn't tell you offhand.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin I'd have to go look it up.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin But obviously it was fairly small. But-
Tim Fulton I'm not here to quiz you, but-
Mike Curtin Yeah, by, by today's standards. They saw a corrupt city. They saw a, a city with a lot of vice, uh, especially a lot of houses of prostitution and gambling houses. They saw a corrupt police department-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... that was in, in bed, if you will, with the, uh, with the, uh, leaders of, uh, of these vice enterprises. They saw basically a weak council.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin You know, a members-by-district-
Tim Fulton Because of its distribution, essentially.
Mike Curtin Well, members who did not have the entire city's interests at heart-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... you know, who were only concerned about their own district and therefore led to a lot of horse trading, a lot of log rolling with other members.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Uh, a lot of self-interest, if you will. Um, but they basically saw a city that was not on the move, uh, compared to other cities.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin And so they studied city administration plans from across the country and thought that this plan we have now was what we should go with.
Tim Fulton Okay. How is it a strong mayoral city? Is it because of that federalist structure, basically?
Mike Curtin Yes. The mayor, as the, as the chief executive of the executive branch, essentially has a point of authority over, uh, all the departments. So he appoints a safety director, he appoints a service director, you know, he appoints, you know, directors of all the city departments. Uh, and so that's, uh, a lot of power-
Tim Fulton That's where that strength lies
Mike Curtin ... to give one elected official, and that's, uh, uh, unlike a lot of cities that have a city manager form of plan.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Um, we've always had the strong mayor system since 1916. Uh, the executive branch clearly is the dominant branch in, in Columbus because the city is so large and there are so many departments to run.
Tim Fulton What do you attribute that difference to from our charter system to other cities?
Mike Curtin Um-
Tim Fulton Or do you have an opinion on it?
Mike Curtin What do I think are the merits and demerits of, of-
Tim Fulton Yeah
Mike Curtin ... of a... Well, when you're, when you're electing only seven members at large, a- and every voter can vote on each and every one of those seven members, you know, clearly you're incentivizing a member to be beholden to the entire city-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... and not just to one neighborhood or, or a congregation of neighborhoods. Uh, I think historically that's been a plus.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Because if you look at Columbus relative to its peer cities, or any cities, quite frankly, in the Midwest or across the country, if on an economic health basis, we're doing awfully well.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Uh, we're en- envied by m- by most cities in Ohio and by lots of cities across the country for our economic health. So clearly the system we have hasn't hurt us.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Um, uh, a downside is when you get as large as we've gotten, it's hard for a, a one, uh, council member among seven-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... to be in tune and in touch with, um, a- A city as diverse-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... as we are. These are statutorily part-time council members.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin Um, most of them, uh, are expected to have another job. This is a big burden. Um, it's a lot to put on a, a member. And the critics of the current system, uh, say that, um, when you're electing seven members at large in this day and age, it becomes a big money game.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin That you simply can't break through unless you're part of a party machine-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... unless you're financed by the big money people in town. And there's merit to that argument.
Tim Fulton Yeah.
Mike Curtin These are very expensive races. It's hard for the so-called little guy, you know, to, uh, to have a chance of getting elected if you're not, you know, part of the inside circle that, quite frankly, is, uh, very much in tune with the, the chief economic interests of the city.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm. Talk about the charter review commission that you co-chaired in 2014, what it was tasked with, and what changes you guys actually made. It was the last time that there was a comprehensive review of the charter.
Mike Curtin We had a five-member commission appointed by the mayor and the city council, uh, to review the entirety of the charter from start to finish and to make recommendations, uh, to council to go to, uh, the electorate with some, um, updates. Uh, it had been many years since there had been a, a thorough review of the charter.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin So a lot of what we recommended, quite frankly, was getting old, antiquated language out-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... and to update the, uh-
Tim Fulton Simply cleaning house, if you will.
Mike Curtin Cleaning house. I mean, for example, the, the recall procedure that was, uh, that was, uh, in the charter, uh, before the fall of 2014 required that anyone, uh, wanting to recall a city official had to post, uh, notices of recall in all the firehouses of the city. Uh, well, the firehouses of the city back in the day were, were gathering places where people-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... would go to read the bulletin board and so forth. Well, that was clearly a, an outdated, you know, mode of, uh, of recalling an elected official. So most of what we recommended and the voters adopted in, in 2014 in, in three ballot issues that packaged, uh, about 14 or 15, uh, items to- total, uh, were, were cleanup mechanisms-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... more than anything else, and streamlining mechanisms and making sure that if you wanted to take advantage, um, uh, of the initiative or, uh, the recall, that there was a streamlined way to do it. The voters also approved a recommendation we made, uh, for judging the incapacity of a elected official, uh, or mayor or council members or auditor or attorney if they became incapacitated.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin If physically or mentally there was no mechanism in the charter.
Tim Fulton It just basically said incapacitated and that wasn't defined?
Mike Curtin There was no defined process-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... for how their colleagues could, could deal with that incapac-
Tim Fulton Just out of interest, what is the process-
Mike Curtin ... incapacitation
Tim Fulton ... for that?
Mike Curtin I would have to go back and read the, the charter. It basically, uh, uses a probate-like procedure.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin There would be an independent evaluation of the competency of the member. Let's assume, for example, uh, God forbid that we had a, uh, a long-serving elected official who, um, uh, became senile, had, um, something like Alzheimer's-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... uh, and didn't know it.
Tim Fulton And insisted on remaining.
Mike Curtin And insisted on remaining.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin Uh, we now have in the charter a provision, you know, whereby that elected officer could be evaluated.
Tim Fulton Gotcha.
Mike Curtin And if need be, we, we could take that person out.
Tim Fulton Now, what about a recall? Has that ever happened in Columbus?
Mike Curtin I am not aware of an actual recall having happened. It certainly hasn't happened in modern times.
Tim Fulton Okay. What is the process for it?
Mike Curtin You circulate petitions. You gather signatures of registered voters, um, of a certain threshold, and once you gather enough signatures and they are validated by the Board of Elections, you can basically have a, a measure go on the ballot that simply says, "Should this elected official be, uh, retained or not retained?"
Tim Fulton It's essentially the same as a citizen-led ballot initiative.
Mike Curtin It, it is. It's a, it's, it's a cit- citizen-led, um, it's an impeachment procedure, basically.
Tim Fulton One that doesn't have to define this is why. It, it simply is a, a confidence vote, right?
Mike Curtin That is correct. If you think somebody's doing a horrible job, if you think somebody is, um, deaf to the, the concerns of the, uh, of the electorate, you can circulate a recall petition. And if you get a sufficient number of signatures, get it on the ballot, and have an up or down vote on whether that person continues in office.
Tim Fulton I wanna get into sort of the district versus ward system. We're sitting down here literally the day after city council tabled their previous initiative as recommended by this last year's, uh, charter review commission. But I wanna talk about first, how does the charter review process work? There are open meetings, but how do you sort of address those, the issues? Do you just sort of do a reading and then bring in experts to consult with?
Mike Curtin Well, the most recent review of the charter was by a committee and not a commission, and the distinction being the committee that recommended we change the structure of city council was charged with reviewing only Section 3 of the charter.
Tim Fulton Got it.
Mike Curtin Section 3 of the charter is the section on the legislative branch and how, how it's composed. So that wasn't a full commission that looked at the entire charter.
Tim Fulton I see. Okay.
Mike Curtin It w- it was a s- committee tasked only with looking at Section 3.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin And, uh, that committee saw merit in retaining at large elections, allowing every voter to vote for every council member.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin But also thought there was merit in having council members, uh, essentially keenly focused on one district.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin And so that committee recommended expanding the current council from seven members to nine-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... um, and requiring each of those nine to come from a specific district. So it was essentially a proposal to create a residency requirement-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... whereby you would have to reside within one of these nine Districts to be able to, uh, run for that district seat on council. But once you qualified for the ballot through the primary, then, uh, you would actually be voted on by every, uh, voter in the city.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin So it was sort of a hybrid, uh, proposal, and there aren't, there aren't many of these. There are a few of these out West, uh, I believe in Arizona and maybe one other Western state.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin So it was a, um, interesting proposal, and council clearly was divided by it. It's my understanding that, um, four members, uh, were ready to vote to put it on the ballot, and three members were not.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin And so there was still a lot of division within council, uh, about the, the merits of going forward now. And so rather than having a four-three vote a- and showing that kind of split-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... uh, they decided to go back to the kitchen and try to, um, have a deeper look.
Tim Fulton Well, in my time, it is a pretty united council, at least since the mid-1990s.
Mike Curtin It, it, it is, and depending on your view, that can be a strength or a weakness.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Uh, s- a lot of the folks who, um, who are the harshest critics of this council, you know, believe it's, it's too cocooned, that they, they, they, they work in cahoots too much, that, uh, showing some division, s- showing some difference of opinion when it comes to vote on things is healthy-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... not unhealthy, and that we should have a little bit more of a, um, you know, healthy debate in front of the public on these measures-
Tim Fulton Yeah
Mike Curtin ... uh, rather than-
Tim Fulton Well, 'cause it's what brings those issues to the fore, right? If you're simply presenting a one-sided argument, you're not discussing the other side of it. And if you're not an elected official, is The Columbus Dispatch gonna go out and try to get a quote from the other side?
Mike Curtin Well, i- in, on this issue, I believe The Dispatch has.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Um, I, I do believe that, um, uh, people like Will Patrick, who's running for council this fall-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... uh, people like Jonathan Beard, who has sponsored and who has spearheaded, uh, initiatives to change the composition of council in the past-
Tim Fulton Which many would argue is the reason why this committee came-
Mike Curtin Sure
Tim Fulton ... about in the first place.
Mike Curtin Oh, oh, absolutely. I think, I think the work, you know, done by the Jonathan Beards and the Will Patricks and others who are the, among the harshest critics of the current composition of council-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... uh, clearly that spurred, uh, council wanting to, to give this issue a thorough review, uh, invite as many voices in as possible, and, uh, see where the discussion led.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin Uh, it's obvious from reading the paper that this process has not pacified, uh, those critics-
Tim Fulton No
Mike Curtin ... at all. They still see it as a totally inside baseball game, and, uh, they would like to, to go to a true district system.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin We'll see where that goes. I mean, as you know, it was on the ballot in August of 2016-
Tim Fulton Yeah
Mike Curtin ... in a special election, which was unfortunate because you only had about a 9% turnout-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... that election. But it went down about 72 to 28. And so if one of the-
Tim Fulton Were you surprised by that?
Mike Curtin Somewhat.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin I w-
Tim Fulton I, I was blown away that through a special election, there was so much of an anti-vote.
Mike Curtin Yeah. Well, um, there was a, there was a campaign conducted against it.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Um, there wasn't much money, uh, s- uh, you know, in a campaign to support it. Uh, and usually in, in special elections, your, your, your hardest core voters come out, and those are people who tend to be more aligned with the status quo, I think.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Um, and quite frankly, uh, and I've been in Columbus for 65 years, you know, all of my life, and, uh, I, I've not seen a organic, you know, authentic grassroots impetus out there for change. You know?
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Where's, where's the voice for change? It's, it's fairly small, if you ask me. It's not broad-based. And so if one's trying to defend the status quo, and I'm not. I mean, I think any, any system can work.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin It, it, the real question is who you elect-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... uh, to make that system work. Any system can work, and cities across the country show that any system can work. It's really, I think, what type of behavior do you want to incentivize?
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Uh, different systems incentivize different behaviors.
Tim Fulton What is the process that that committee and your commission went through to s- to evaluate? Do you benchmark against other cities?
Mike Curtin Yes. The commission I was on met for over a four-month period, and through city council staff, commissioned a lot of research-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... to show how we compared and contrasted with other cities in Ohio and other cities across the country, um, in terms of the major provisions of the charter. So it was a deep dive, and, uh, we, we read reams and reams of, uh, research documents in considering what we might recommend in the way of change. The current, uh, committee or the recently, uh, impaneled committee only looked at the composition of council.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin And they held hearings throughout the city, uh, most of which were very, very poorly attended.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Uh, I went to a couple of them and, you know, there were maybe a handful of people in the audience.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Which again speaks to my earlier point of, you know, where's the-
Tim Fulton Where is this grassroots uprising?
Mike Curtin Yeah. Where, where is the call for change? It's, it's fairly, uh, narrow and deep-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... as opposed to being widespread, I think. And so that's one of the things that's given pause to this council, I believe. You know? Uh, there's a debate going on, I think, over there at, uh, 90 West Broad-
Tim Fulton Uh-huh
Mike Curtin ... over who are we responding to, you know? Is there really a momentum out there for change, or are we just going through all this to, um, uh-
Tim Fulton To supplicate a couple of people?
Mike Curtin Yeah.
Tim Fulton Yeah.
Mike Curtin Yeah.
Tim Fulton Can I ask your commission, while it was seated in order to... I think the stated intention was to simply update a lot of the language that was in the charter, why you guys didn't make more changes to it? Or was that simply not part of what you were impaneled to do?
Mike Curtin We were not asked to recommend specific changes.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Uh, we did, uh, quite frankly shy away from the question of composition of council-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... because we knew that was on a separate track. You know, we knew that, uh, there were, uh-
Tim Fulton Even in 2014?
Mike Curtin Oh, yes.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Yeah. You know, we knew there were efforts being made to, um- Qualify an initiative for the ballot. And so we thought, "Well, that's gonna take care of itself."
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin It looked as though the momentum was there from this group to qualify an initiative and rather than, you know, get in its way-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... rather than look like we were trying to compete with it, let that effort run its course.
Tim Fulton Or preempt it, really.
Mike Curtin Yeah, we didn't wanna preempt it.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin You know, we really didn't want to, um, look as though we were a vehicle for trying to neuter, you know, that, that effort. Um, that was running on a separate track. So we, we shied away from it, and we really focused on recommendations that we thought would, you know, clean up a nearly century-old document. And there were a lot of cobwebs.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin There was a lot of arcane language. There was a lot of sexist language-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... uh, referring to he's all the time.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin You have to remember this charter predated women having the vote.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin Uh, women didn't get to vote until 1920. This charter, uh, was voted on in 1914.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin So there was just a lot of old, uh, cobwebs to clean out, quite frankly, and that's what we did. There, there was a lot we did not need to change.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin And one of the beauties of our city charter is a lot of it has served us well for a century. I would argue that having an independently elected city attorney-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... is a huge advantage for Columbus.
Tim Fulton Talk about what the virtue of that is.
Mike Curtin Uh, a city attorney who is beholden to the voters and not to the mayor or council.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin In most cities, the chief legal officer is an appointee of the mayor or the-
Tim Fulton And so can be instructed to work for the mayor, basically.
Mike Curtin Yes, can be instructed to do this and not do that. Our city attorney, as an independently elected office holder, is beholden to the electorate, and if he has to deliver some unwelcome news to the mayor, he can do it or she can do it. We've had both male and female city attorneys. Same thing with the city auditor. We haven't had a female city auditor, but the city auditor by charter is a chief accounting officer, uh, of the city, and Hugh Dorian, who's filled that role now for a half century-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... is famously independent for letting both Republican and Democratic mayors over his long tenure know when he disagreed with them.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin For example, when Tom Moody, uh, in the 1970s, was hell-bent on getting a trash-burning power plant-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... which went on to be the biggest white elephant that this city has ever sponsored-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... 'cause the thing never worked right. It was a, it was a multi, multi-hundred of millions of, millions of dollar boondoggle. You know, Hugh Dorian, our city auditor, was saying, "I oppose this because it's not financially stable-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... and it's not financially proven, and I think we're making an awfully big bet here that we're likely to lose."
Tim Fulton But in the end, the mayor can push that through if they want.
Mike Curtin Well, the mayor, the mayor put a bond issue on the ballot, um, that the voters approved-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... uh, in 1977, which paved the way for the construction of a trash-burning power plant that never worked.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin And, uh, a city auditor or, or a chief accounting officer appointed by the mayor would never have had the independence and the, uh, cojones, if you will, you know, to, uh, say, "Mayor, I disagree with you," and to publicly disagree.
Tim Fulton Right. The public never would've heard about it, basically.
Mike Curtin The public never would've heard about that.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin And so, uh, whether it was a trash-burning power plant or whether it was Hugh Dorian, uh, publicly, uh, informing Mayor Coleman a few years ago they were spending money too fast.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin You know, we had a city income tax cr- in- tax increase in 2009-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... when it went from 2% to 2.5% of the city income tax. And after, uh, several years, uh, City Auditor Dorian wrote a memo to the mayor, which of course became public and-
Tim Fulton Public record, right
Mike Curtin ... it became a, uh, story on the front page of The Dispatch saying, "We're burning through this money awfully quickly, and if, if you're not careful, we'll have spent this entire increase in a matter of a few years." And that was a wake-up call to the mayor. It was a wake-up call to the city, and quite frankly, it prompted a, uh, expenditure review committee to, uh, start, um, looking at how they could curtail the increase in city general fund spending. If you don't have an independent chief accounting officer-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... that never would've happened. So those are two examples where Columbus is very well served by this charter and those two independently elected offices.
Tim Fulton Have there been public conflicts between the city attorney and the mayor?
Mike Curtin Um, there have been some. They are usually behind the scenes-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... and not public because the city attorney has a legal fiduciary obligation to his clients. His clients are the, uh, other city officials.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin The city attorney, you know, represents the mayor just like an, a private attorney would represent you.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin And so even though that attorney is beholden to the, to the voters, that city attorney also has a, uh, legal fiduciary obligation to the mayor, to council, to not go out of his way, you know, to embarrass them.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin So there's... He must walk a line-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... on the one hand being independent, on the other hand advising his clients in a way that is in their best interest. And so it, it's rare to have a real big public clash between your city attorney and your other city office holders.
Tim Fulton If you had a crystal ball, do you think that there will be significant changes to the charter, let's say, within the next five years, and specifically to the composition of council?
Mike Curtin I think we'll see a change within the next five years-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... uh, of one kind or another, simply because a seven-member, part-time, at-large council has a hard time representing a city that's rapidly approaching one million people.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin It, it's... There has to be some give one way or another. I believe the council will either grow to 9 or 11 members and, and remain at large-
Tim Fulton Okay
Mike Curtin ... or there will, or it will grow and we will have sort of, some sort of hybrid plan that combines districts with at large. But Everything changes over time. It may take 100 years for things to change-
Tim Fulton Yeah
Mike Curtin ... as it has in this case. But it's hard for me to envision a seven-member at-large council being in place five, 10, 20 years from now.
Tim Fulton Do you think that there's better ways or different ways, speaking to you with your background both as a public official from the 17th House District and from your background at The Dispatch, are there things that you believe council should be doing to address some of the, the pain points that were brought up in the citizen-led ballot issue in 2016, like neighborhoods not getting the attention they deserve?
Mike Curtin Well, I think one thing we can do, and a number of people have discussed this, is to strengthen the area commissions.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin Um, Columbus has had a network of area commissions going back to the 1970s. Uh, a city with the kinda size and diversity that Columbus has, uh, needs many councils, if you will-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... which area commissions are-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... to focus specifically on, uh, the needs, the strengths and weaknesses of those areas.
Tim Fulton But they are simply tasked with making recommendations to council.
Mike Curtin They, they, they only have recommending authority, but some of those commissions are extremely influential.
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm.
Mike Curtin The Clintonville Area Commission, for example, long has been extremely influential. If you're a developer wanting to develop something in Clintonville, you don't wanna run afoul of the Clintonville Area Commission.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin You know, they make recommendations that are taken very seriously by city council and the mayor. Um, other areas of town have had, um, mixed success with commissions, some with strong commissions, some with weak, and some with, or don't even have commissions now.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin But I, I think, um, a bona fide, authentic attempt to make sure that each area of town has a civic body-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... you know, an area commission, a civic association that has, uh, real power, that has a recommending authority that's taken seriously by City Hall, uh, is one way, uh, and a pr- a time-proven way-
Tim Fulton Mm-hmm
Mike Curtin ... you know, to address local, local needs, if you will.
Tim Fulton Right.
Mike Curtin And if we do get to councils by district at some point, I would hope that the boundaries of those council districts would be coterminous.
Tim Fulton Okay.
Mike Curtin Would be in sync with boundaries of a number of these area commissions and civic associations. It would make no sense to balkanize the city, to have council districts that weren't in conformance-
Tim Fulton Right
Mike Curtin ... with neighborhood, you know, commission and area commission, uh, districts. I think great care should be taken if and when we have council by districts to make sure those districts a, align with each other so, uh, we don't have a s- gerrymandering at the city level.
Tim Fulton Absolutely. Mike, thank you so much for your time. Really appreciate it.
Mike Curtin Thank you for having me. It's been a privilege.
Tim Fulton Thank you for listening to the Confluence Cast presented by Columbus Underground. Again, you can get more information on what we discussed today in the show notes for this episode at theconfluencecast.com. Please rate, subscribe, share this episode of The Confluence Cast with your friends, family, contacts, enemies, your favorite civil servant. If you're interested in sponsoring The Confluence Cast, get in touch with us. We can be reached by email at info@theconfluencecast.com. Our theme music was composed by Benji Robinson. I'm your host, Tim Fulton. Have a great week.
